Memorial Day – Remembering Those Who Died

memorialday_cemeteryMemorial Day is one of those holidays that does not seem to be fully understood by some folks. For some it is the unofficial start of the the summer vacation season; for others it is the day when traffic in Washington, DC begins to lighten up for a few days. Some think of it as the day the Indianapolis 500 is run. Others think of it as a time to thank veterans for their service.

It may be all of those things, but Memorial Day has a greater and far more important purpose. At the end of the Civil War, families, friends and grateful citizens began decorating the graves of fallen soldiers. The commemoration of their sacrifice evolved into what we know today as Memorial Day. The act of decorating the graves with flowers and flags is so central to the day that in many parts of the country Memorial Day is still called “Decoration Day.” Whatever you call it, Memorial Day is intended as a time to recognize the sacrifice of military personnel who died in service to our country.

The original Memorial Day Order, signed by the Commander in Chief of the Grand Army of the Republic in 1868 says it best:

“We should guard their graves with sacred vigilance. All that the consecrated wealth and taste of the nation can add to their adornment and security is but a fitting tribute to the memory of her slain defenders. Let no wanton foot tread rudely on such hallowed grounds. Let pleasant paths invite the coming and going of reverent visitors and fond mourners. Let no vandalism of avarice or neglect, no ravages of time, testify to the present or to the coming generations that we have forgotten, as a people, the cost of a free and undivided republic.

If other eyes grow dull and other hands slack, and other hearts cold in the solemn trust, ours shall keep it well as long as the light and warmth of life remains in us.

Let us, then, at the time appointed, gather around their sacred remains and garland the passionless mounds above them with choicest flowers of springtime; let us raise above them the dear old flag they saved from dishonor; let us in this solemn presence renew our pledges to aid and assist those whom they have left among us as sacred charges upon the nation’s gratitude—the soldier’s and sailor’s widow and orphan.

While we spend time this holiday weekend with our friends and family, let us not forget what Memorial Day is all about and the supreme sacrifice made by those men and women who are no longer among us.

The muffled drum's sad roll has beat
The soldier's last tattoo;
No more on life's parade shall meet
The brave and daring few.
On Fame's eternal camping-ground
Their silent tents are spread,
And Glory guards with solemn round
The bivouac of the dead.

The Bivouac of the Dead
Theodore O'Hara

Is Federal HR Really Shrinking?

I recently wrote a post titled “Federal HR is Mission Critical. Is it Mission Capable.” In it I outlined the reasons why I believe the entire federal HR apparatus, including OPM, hiring managers and operating HR offices, need to be substantially improved. This is the second of this series and will address the issue of shrinking HR offices.

There is no good source that lays out the exact number of HR folks in government, so the best proxy is the number of HR specialists, clerks and assistants. Those folks comprise the bulk of the staff doing HR work, although many HR offices and HR-related organizations have many more employees who are not in an HR job series. It is safe to estimate that these numbers understate the number of HR folks by at least 10%, and probably more like twice that.

I was particularly interested in the number of HR positions because I have heard so many people talking about how HR is shrinking everywhere. Even at OPM’s recent event announcing the Hiring Excellence campaign, one participant said ““The HR staffs are shrinking, but the workload is increasing.” I am certain there are HR organizations that have suffered reductions, but it is not accurate to assume that applies everywhere.

Let’s take a look at some data. If we get in our wayback machine and go back 10 years to 2006, we would find 23,075 HR specialists and 13,494 HR clerks and assistants, for a total of 36,569. The numbers have gone up and down a bit over the past 10 years, and now we have 28,265 HR specialists and 11,031 clerks and assistants, for a total of 39,296. Since 2006, the number of HR specialists has increased by 22.5% and the number of HR clerks and assistants has decreased by 18.3%. The total number of people in the GS-201 and GS-203 job series has increased by 7.5%.

HR Job Series History 2006 - 2015

If we dig a little deeper, we find that OPM merged the military personnel jobs with civilian HR when the GS-201 classification standard was rewritten (in 2000). So – let’s take DoD positions in the GS-201 series out of the mix and see what happens. In 2006, there were 10,690 GS-201s in DoD. That left 12,285 non-Defense GS-201 jobs. In 2015, there were 13,267 GS-201 jobs in DoD, leaving 14,998 non-Defense GS-201s. The increase in non-Defense GS-201 positions from 2006 to 2015 is 22% – almost exactly what the overall increase in the number of GS-201 positions government-wide.

I discussed my preliminary findings with a colleague who is a former HR director and she pointed out that many of the reductions in HR occurred as a result of the National Performance Review (NPR), during the Clinton administration. One of the NPR’s big goals was reducing the number of “control” positions like HR and procurement.

I went back to the oldest data available in OPM’s Fedscope (1998) and found the number of HR specialists, adjusting for the changes in the classification standard in 2000, was 21,368. Exact numbers on NPR reductions are hard to come by, but in 1996 the NPR reported that 2,500 HR positions had been eliminated since 1993. If we are very generous and assume all of those jobs were specialists (and assuming a few more reductions between 1996 and 1998), that would put the pre-NPR HR specialists at somewhere around 24,000. Even using that number as a benchmark, the number of HR specialist jobs dipped and then went back up to a number that is greater than the pre-NPR numbers.

It is safe to say that some HR offices are shrinking, but if that is true, it is also has to be true that others have grown. The total number of HR specialists has grown substantially in the last decade, while the number of HR clerks and assistants has dropped. Much of the decrease in clerk and assistant jobs can be attributed to increasing automation. No matter how we look at it, the government is spending more money on HR positions than it did in the past. In the spirit of the fact-checking that is common in this election year, I would rate the claim that HR is shrinking as “Mostly False.”